Pylos is a two-player abstract game that promises an exciting race to be the first to place their final sphere at the top of the shared pyramid of wooden balls on the board. Designed by David Royffe and published by Gigamic, Pylos seems to offer a straightforward and engaging gameplay experience.
Upon closer inspection, the rules of Pylos are indeed simple, to the point where one can grasp the entire game just by looking at the picture on the box. However, the simplicity of Pylos may also be its downfall. While there is room for strategic maneuvering to force your opponent into unfavorable positions or block their moves, the gameplay ultimately feels monotonous. Skilled players will often be able to prevent any advantageous moves from being made, much like in Tic-Tac-Toe. Once you understand the game mechanics, Pylos begins to play itself without offering any surprises or unique challenges.
Comparatively, Quarto, another abstract game from Gigamic, manages to succeed where Pylos falls short. The complexity of Quarto’s board state adds an element of mental gymnastics, making it harder for players to keep track of all the available moves and potentially leading to mistakes. In Pylos, however, the simplicity of the game leaves nothing to the imagination, as the light and dark colored balls don’t hide any strategic surprises.
Furthermore, the production quality of Pylos leaves much to be desired. While the sturdy board and solid wooden pieces are commendable, the design of the game’s components is flawed. The balls are meant to fit neatly in the carved channel around the edge of the board, but in reality, they often do not fit properly. This results in frequent ball displacements or even loss during gameplay. Additionally, the game’s packaging occupies a standard-sized box, which feels wasteful considering it is essentially a 3D version of Tic-Tac-Toe.
In conclusion, while Pylos may initially seem like an intriguing two-player game, it ultimately falls short of delivering a satisfying gaming experience. Its simplicity and lack of surprises make it a pass for seasoned players, and the production flaws only add to the disappointment. Players seeking a more engaging and strategic experience should explore other abstract games, such as Shobu.
Pylos是一种双人抽象游戏，承诺一个激动人心的比赛，第一个把自己的最终球放在共享金字塔的顶部。由David Royffe设计并由Gigamic出版，Pylos似乎提供了一个简单而有趣的游戏体验。
仔细研究后，Pylos的规则确实很简单，以至于只需看一下盒子上的图片就能理解整个游戏。然而，Pylos的简单性也可能导致其失败。虽然有地方可以进行策略性机动，迫使对手处于不利位置或阻止他们的棋步，但游戏本身的玩法最终会感到单调。熟练的玩家往往能够阻止任何有利的棋步被执行，就像井字游戏一样。一旦你理解了游戏机制，Pylos开始自动播放，没有任何惊喜或独特的挑战。
相比之下，Gigamic出版的另一个抽象游戏Quarto在Pylos不足之处取得了成功。Quarto的棋盘局势复杂，增加了一种思维训练的元素，使玩家更难跟踪所有可行棋步，潜在地导致错误。然而，在Pylos中，游戏的简单性并没有隐藏任何策略上的惊喜，因为浅色和深色的小球都没有。
此外，Pylos的生产质量令人失望。尽管坚固的棋盘和实木棋子值得赞扬，但游戏组件的设计存在缺陷。小球应该整齐地放在棋盘边缘的雕刻通道中，但实际上通常无法正确安装。这导致经常发生小球位移甚至在游戏过程中丢失。此外，游戏的包装采用标准尺寸的盒子，考虑到它实际上是井字游戏的3D版本，这在感觉上很浪费。
总之，尽管Pylos可能一开始似乎是一个有趣的双人游戏，但最终它未能提供令人满意的游戏体验。它的简单性和没有惊喜使其成为经验丰富的玩家的绕过之选，而制作缺陷只增加了失望感。寻求更具吸引力和策略性体验的玩家应该尝试其他抽象游戏，如Shobu。
—
关键词与术语定义：
1. Pylos：一种双人抽象游戏，玩家需要赛跑将自己的最终球放在共享金字塔的顶部。
2. abstract game：抽象游戏，以简化的规则和抽象的形式为主。
3. Gigamic：Gigamic是一家出版社，出版各种棋盘游戏和抽象游戏。
4. mental gymnastics：思维训练，指用于解决问题或进行推理的复杂的思维过程。
5. strategic maneuvering：战略机动，指为了达到某种目标而采取的巧妙的行动。
6. Tic-Tac-Toe：井字游戏，双方轮流在3×3的棋盘上放置自己的符号，首先连成一条线者获胜。
7. Quarto：一种抽象游戏，与Pylos类似但更复杂，具有更多的可行棋步。
推荐链接：
– Gigamic 官方网站
– Shobu 游戏官方网站